When travelling to Canberra, the pond always likes to take the detour to see the artwork at Collector, though unfortunately the pond didn't take any fill lighting to compensate for the back lighting ...
It seems to grow a little sorrier by the decade, but at least they keep the grass cut ... and it is better than Canberra's risible attempts to match Melbourne at public sculpture ...
Oh please, that's so 1970s, or 2009 if you will at the Wayback Machine ...
As for today's offerings, the pond remains on a sort of break, and gaily tripped on by ...
Oh please simplistic Simon offering a reality check (as opposed to his own conflict of interest), and the lizard Oz editorialist already flagging reptile knee capping attempt, and the bouffant one blathering on about the fine emissions print?
And that was matched by the bromancer getting all atremble and aquiver at ruffling the dragon, while ancient Troy was getting agitated about the Donald?
That reminded the pond of some holyday reading it had been doing ...
Usually the pond isn't a big Jack Shafer fan, but sometimes cynicism is in order, as in this piece ...
The slow learners at the New York Post and Wall Street Journal editorial pages had a revelation on Friday. As if synchronized to sing the same tune at the same time by their owner, Rupert Murdoch, they cited the proceedings of the Jan. 6 Committee to conclude that Donald Trump had failed to uphold his oath to defend and protect the Constitution.
How could Murdoch, whose editorial pages and Fox News Channel defended Trump for the past six years, have suddenly turned on the former president so viciously? As I, the Jury’s detective Mike Hammer said to love interest Charlotte Manning when she asked the same question as he gut-shot her dead, “It was easy.”
…Although it looks great in headlines, the Murdoch-Trump divorce isn’t the seismic event that some pretend it is. The two masters of demagoguery have had their differences over the years. In 2015, Murdoch was calling Trump a “phony” to his friends and a “fucking idiot,” according to Michael Wolff’s 2018 book Fire and Fury. These insults did not prevent Trump from using Murdoch or Murdoch from using Trump. If Trump runs for president in 2024 and buries the field, there will be plenty of time for Murdoch to do what he traditionally does: Place his bet on the leading pony. Like a pair of powerful gangsters who quarrel over how to divide the spoils, Murdoch and Trump will reconcile if they determine it’s in their mutual interests to reconcile.
How could they possibly do that? It would be easy.
Join the slow learners' club, ancient Troy. When you work for a latter day power hungry Hearst, it's easy.
And the triptych of terrors held no horrors or nightmares for the pond ...
Penbo on the union-bashing case, and that jersey - yes it's all the fault of Hollywood 'leets - and a chance for the pond to cut nattering "Ned" dead, not even offering a little finger for his talk of governing competence, when the previous mob showed how it was done by letting loose on water matters in a most shameful way as a last desperate election day ploy ... why it's almost like barreling along with Barilaro if you want to go in search of governing competence...
After all that, the pond got to thinking. If it wanted a decent serve of climate science denialism, it would hop in its time machine and head back to Monday, though the question then arises: does ancient Major deserve a rehashing, or should the ancient Major simply be hashed?
Actually there are events all over the place, beyond the Major and the Bjorn-again one's ken (is there any other columnist who would feature the Bjorn-again one at the top of his piece? Is an unprecedented hot day entirely precedented in the Major's world?).
Ignoring the California wildfires and the assorted droughts and flooding events, the pond has been fascinated in recent times by the melting of the glaciers ...
Even a staid rag such as
USA Today had taken notice ...
Yes, the rag was full of the news ... designed to send the Major into a melt down ...
In the 1980s and 1990s in Greenland, a melt event of this sort never occurred, but starting in the 2000s – especially since 2010 – the melting has been more extensive.
The melt is two times larger than normal, said Xavier Fettweis of the University of Liège. Fettweis, a polar researcher, created a model scientists use, along with satellite data, to study Greenland's changes.
The melt is among two of the largest melts in the ice sheet history after the 2012 and 2019 melting events; in 2019, the runoff was about 527 billion tons. So far, the total melt is far below 2019 levels, but the situation is more dire over the Svalbard ice caps at the North of Norway, Fettweis said.
More melting was expected, said Scambos, of the National Snow and Ice Data Center. "This event is one of many events over the whole summer," he said. "We can expect on the order of 100 billion tons of water going into the ocean. Greenland as a whole is losing a tremendous amount of ice every year now."
NASA Goddard Space Flight Center ice scientist Nathan Kurtz was recently in Greenland to help better calibrate ICESat-2, one of the agency's satellites used to monitor Greenland.
Its data has shown a loss of ice from Greenland of about 200 billion tons a year over the past two decades, Kurtz told USA TODAY. "This loss of ice contributes directly to global sea level rise, which has significant societal impacts," he said.
Lipscomb, of the National Center for Atmospheric Research, said scientists measure the amount of water melted in units of gigatons per year, or 1 billion tons of water. Before climate change, about 600 gigatons of snowfall were coming in each year and about 300 gigatons were going out in the form of summer melting.
Now, Greenland's ice sheet is losing nearly 300 gigatons of water each year more than it gains from snowfall, Lipscomb said. "There's still time to avoid catastrophic sea level rise, but every year that greenhouse gas emissions continue at the present rate increases the chances of serious problems down the road."
In some parts of the world such as Asia, seasonal water supply depend on the timing of the glacier melt.
"If the melt is happening too early, you may not be getting the water when you need it for farming," he said. "And if the glaciers completely melt, then you won't have the glacier melt water source at all. And that's something people worry about for later this century as the warming continues."
And as for those heatwaves, fancy finding this in
The Hill ...
Indeed, it was all hunky dory, and the Major was on top of it ...
All that deserves a cartoon or two...
Back to the Major, and the usual click bait video, carefully neutered ...
Oh all that deserves a cartoon, as we're talking of reptile posturing ...
And in the final gobbet, the Major gives the game away by mentioning his notion of a climate scientist.
The pond has been down the Judith Curry road many times before ... she's been at it for a long time, and her
DeSmog listing has a hard time keeping up, and who else could write,
Trump’s election provided an opportunity for a more rational energy and climate policy, but why is the pond not surprised by the Major and his reading? (careful with that link, there's a glowering photo that looks like a prison mug shot)
And the Major will continue to boost climate science denialists, rogues and ratbags, it's Nature's way of fucking itself ...
Also out and about on the Monday was the Caterist, and that raised an even more important question - is there any point revisiting tired Caterist vomit, exposed for a couple of days to the noon day sun?
Never mind, the pond is holding its nose as it plunges in ...
What's funny here? Well the notion that the Caterist has a sensa huma is a good start. We all know how the reptiles respond to a little satire ...
celebrated at Facebook ...
Should the pond deplatform the Caterist, carrying on like a dog fucker? Or perhaps a pork chop? It's a powerful temptation ...
But then there's the sheer comedy of those who celebrate white nationalist Xians while deploring those bloody Puritans ...
Of course there's been no inequality and oppression ... if being three fifths human is written into the Constitution, it must be good and right and applied to Clarence ...
It sort of fits into the game plan that the pond read in
the Beast ... (might be paywalled)
To achieve its goal, the right uses a now familiar four-part strategy.
First, Republicans use any means necessary to achieve power and promote their unpopular, extremist, counter-majoritarian agenda.
Second, they create and promote disinformation and lies to frighten their base and Jedi mind-trick them into believing they are being oppressed by the actual victims.
Third, they create a specific villain, target them, and then attack them through scapegoating, smearing, and intimidation.
Fourth, they never apologize or back down once their lie is exposed, but instead, they double down, and in times of doubt, always pivot towards racism and fear-mongering.
Yeah, that sort of fits. The pond could make a good case for the Caterist being irritated he couldn't sue some comedian for calling him a floodwaters quarry fucker ...
Or perhaps abortion will be banned in many states and the new Gilead earnestly sought by the right will come to pass - there's a bundle of laughs to be had at a woman's encounter with a coat hanger - or perhaps the Caterist will be remembered mainly as a fleeting comedy item, and a floodwater quarry fucker ...
And so on the Tuesday came a good Groaning, with heaps of click bait videos to neuter ... but please note the demonic hellfire glow in the opening snap ...
The pond reckons that Dame Groan has a new hero ...
So it's on with how to do climate science denialism, Dame Groan style ... with much pursing of lips and sighs of disapproval ... oh how it's all too hard, because it will lead to chaos, when things are going spiffingly well in Dame Groan's air-conditioned world ...
Indeed, indeed ...
And yet there's still more groaning, and click bait videos, a sure sign of reptile silver lining ...
If the pond might be so bold, it has been looking at plucky England, and wondered why so many of them wanted to flee to the perfidious, deviant French, only to get stuck in Dover ... and as well as cunning ploys to keep the lads and lasses exploring the Moors, Andrew Rawsnley offered
a good trussing in the Graudian ...
The signature pledge of her campaign is that she can magic up £30bn of instant tax cuts by putting the cost on borrowing. Mrs Thatcher would not applaud this; she would be aghast at the frivolity of such fantasy economics. The Iron Lady didn’t believe in unfunded and inflation-fuelling giveaways. She would be horrified by the notion of piling on more national debt when the government is already making record interest payments on its borrowing. Trussism isn’t Thatcherism. What she’s peddling is cakeism. In that sense too, she is the true heir of the outgoing prime minister.
She is the anointed one of the Johnsonites. Jacob Rees-Mogg and Nadine Dorries are her noisiest cheerleaders. The Johnson-backing media has wielded its hatchets in a brutal effort to destroy her competitors. This is in part because she stayed in his cabinet to the shabby end and in part because the Brextremists think she will be their puppet. “She is the adoptive child of the ERG [European Research Group] and all the other batshit groups on the right of the party,” says one Tory MP who would describe himself as a man of the right. Some think Mr Johnson wants her to succeed him not just because he hates Mr Sunak, but because he believes Ms Truss will protect him and his secrets. Mr Cummings has a conspiracy theory, which sounds so wacky it could be true, that Mr Johnson reckons there’s a good chance she will blow up at Number 10, opening the door for him to return.
He is the only prime minister of modern times to have been fired by his own MPs for being unfit to hold the office. In those circumstances, and paying attention to what the public think, you might expect the Conservative party to choose a successor who is as little like him as possible. Apparently not. If the polling of the intentions of the tiny selectorate is accurate, the Tory party is embracing someone with many strikingly similar characteristics. The last thing Britain wants or needs is a Boris Johnson Mark 2, but there is nothing Britain can do to stop Tory activists handing the keys of Number 10 to another wild blond opportunist whose primary talent is the spinning of fairytales.
Go Tories, go cakeism, go the Groaning, and here's another cartoon celebrating Dame Groan's hero ...
... though it possibly should have been one celebrating plucky England ...
And so to another short groaning, and click bait video, with Dame Groan turning on her own kind ...
There's no doubt about it ... the Groaner is solid ... and knows how to send out the zzzzz's ...
And so to a last burst of groaning ...
Not just a warm inner glow ... there's always that warm outer glow that Dame Groan loves ...
At this point, the pond is long over length and would usually give the game away ... but really what could the pond do but link to that story in The New Yorker, Living through India's next level heat wave ... what a pity the Major and the Groaner would miss it, yet it's currently outside the paywall, or maybe not, whatever, it's a wretched read featuring much suffering ...
And so on to providing evidence that the pond was up to date, that this was being done by the pond on the actual Wednesday, with the holyday soon to come to an end, by turning to Dame Slap for a damn good slapping ...
Why should the pond care about length? It's on holydays and it sort of misses the reptiles ...
... and besides, those damned pesky, difficult, awkward blacks are always handy for a damned hard slapping ...
At some point, Dame Slap will rail at the dangerous 'leets, from her eyrie on planet Janet, but the pond thinks it has found where these 'leets like to park ...
Damn you croquet club 'leets, damn you to hell ... but back to the black bashing ... because Dame Slap and white voters are so put upon ...
Luckily of course Dame Groan is an originalist, and all the Constitution said was that black bashing was a noble sport ... and laws governing the sport might be made if white voters had an inclination to so instruct their members, and speaking of members, the pond must confess that it only ran with Dame Slap so it could catch up with a few infallible Popes ...
Now back to the originalist, being as original as Ginni Thomas in a white nationalist Q fever dream ...
At last a glimmer, a shred, a glimmer of self-awareness, from an impolite, ignorant and ideological Dame Slap shouting at the world from her planet Janet eyrie ... quoting a film no doubt full of pesky, difficult blacks attempting a land claim ...and that just leaves time for an earlier infallible Pope and a couple of immortal Rowes ...
Jack Shafer: "Although it looks great in headlines, the Murdoch-Trump divorce isn’t the seismic event that some pretend it is." No, ineed not for as has been pointed out, almost nobody reads the "print" editions nowadays and Fox News is still blasting out the pro-Trump agitprop incessantly and keeping the loyal Trumpanistas on the bandwagon.
ReplyDeleteBut who knows, The Guardian's Robert Reich has it that: "There are also signs that Murdoch’s most powerful media property, Fox News, is beginning to change its stance. On Friday, Fox News elected not to broadcast a Trump rally in Arizona during which a state endorsement met with boos. Instead, Fox News broadcast an interview with DeSantis." Ok, so maybe a change of cast, but still the same old same old anyway. Nothing will really change until the whole Fox News lot join in the Trump rout.
https://www.theguardian.com/media/2022/jul/25/new-york-post-trump-murdoch-wall-street-journal-fox-news?amp;amp;amp
It’s always a sensible move to give Ned a miss, but particularly any time he flags a “Test” for a government - that’s a sign you’re in for a particularly lengthy, ponderous drone. I suppose it’s appropriate for the News Corp suspicion of modern education that they favour exams, rather than any sort of ongoing assessment.
ReplyDeleteSad news about Collector - it’s annual Pumpkin Festival was a cultural highlight, but after a couple of cancellations due to COVID it appears to have been abandoned. Yet another crime to lay at the feet of Dr Fauci and the One World Government!
I wondered why Dame Slap put her focus on the resolution of a question that came up so early in the exercise of drafting a constitution (which the then citizens would humbly submit to a supposedly superior parliament) and not use the most recent group of amendments, which, I would maintain, showed that voters were quite comfortable to vote on a simple concept - choosing to support some, and reject another. Then it came to me - although that is within the living memory of many of us - who also voted at that time - this Dame was barely a Princess in age. Of course, being the advanced little thinker that she no doubt claims to have been (in retrospect) no doubt she was engaging in the public debate about recognising the concept of 'party' in the constitution. I can't recall any letters to the Adelaide newspapers with her name - but even then they were fairly stolid stuff.
ReplyDeleteNeither can I recall any agitation from her ten years on when a Tasmanian government of a certain caste managed to apply a pettifogging interpretation to that part of the constitution. Oh, if only the Juris Doctors and the Garricks had been around to think for us then.
Well that's the 'mirror image' isn't it: "as it is now, so it has always been". But then, I guess there's lots of people, not only rampant reptiles, who simply aren't aware that the Australian Constitution contains very little reference to "political parties".
DeleteMaybe the Constitutioners thought a Greek style of an 'all in' parliament was the go ? Just a big village moot when all is said and done. Perhaps we should also have gone for 'sortition' after all - then the 'random lot' would have selected any replacement Reps and/or Sens.
I will admit I am sorely tempted by the idea of sortition. It should not be particularly strange as a concept - we are generally happy about drawing 12 citizens, pretty much at random, to consider the opposing points of view offered in our adversarial legal system, and to arrive at conclusions that can determine the course of the life of a person before a court.
DeleteWell, generally happy - count me amongst those who are decidedly uneasy about a 'superior' court, looking over such a decision in the recent case of a prominent churchman, sniffily telling the jury in that case that they really should have come to a different conclusion, but remaining fairly vague on just how 12 ordinary citizens could have concluded otherwise. And I cannot recall any particular outcry from those who offer opinions on 'the law' for Rupert's readers, about an appeal court being so dismissive of a jury.
Deary me, now the Maj. Mitch. is in the 'precedential' business: "...high CO2 concentrations: 400 parts per million in the Pliocene Epoch 2.6 million years ago, compared with 416 ppm today, as high as 3000 ppm 150 million tears ago, and 6000 ppm 400 million years ago". Oh wau, and homo sapiens sapiens has been around for all of 190,000 years or so it's reckoned, so we - and all the other species currently extant - have all been through this before: completely and totally precedented !
ReplyDeleteBut as usual with reptiles, Maj. Mitch. runs with the "as it is now, so it shall ever be" fallacy. Clearly, we can keep blasting CO2 into the atmosphere for decades, maybe centuries, more and we'll still be just preventing "a further warming of 0.4 degrees". And that will last for the next 150 (or maybe 400) million years. By which time, Mitch. might finally have retired.
With the 'mature' Mitchell scattering factoids from various times in the past, I looked for reference to the 'Azolla event', but that would involve a sense of irony, which none of them 'do'.
DeleteThe 'Wiki' has a neat little article on the 'Azolla event' - essentially describing how this fern brought our planet back from serious atmospheric heating, to the climate we are familiar with, by taking up huge quantities of CO2 and locking it away in sediments in what is now the Arctic. OK, all that was around 49 million years ago, but the more important observation was that the evidence suggests it took around 800 000 years to effect a useful reduction in CO2.
The irony comes with the steady loss of ice, across the Arctic sea, allowing more exploration for fossil fuel companies to test the sediments for exploitable hydrocarbons. Yep - global warming, particularly across the Arctic, offers great new opportunities to fossil fuel companies. Why, there could be enough hydrocarbons up there to run the world's airconditioners for 800 000 years while 'nature' sets the climate right again.
I do nod approvingly to the Azolla that grows on the dams on my estate. We could be needing it again (although my local council lists it as a potential weed, but that is a whole 'nother story).
Of course it's a weed, Chad. Because of it (et al) our planet missed its chance to be converted into a spectacular, and almost certainly lifeless, mighty 'greenhouse' planet like Venus. But we are doing our very best to achieve that glorious destiny.
DeleteThough I wouldn't expect the Maj. to grasp that, as he, like all the climate denialist reptiles, seems to think we can just keep on blasting CO2 out into the atmosphere and it won't ever accumulate into a lasting transformation.
The Groany: "In Canada, for instance, there has been only a tiny drop in emissions since 2005." Now, considering Canada:
ReplyDeletePopulation in 2005 = 32,215,916, population in 2022 = 38,454,327. Difference = 6,238,417 = 19.36%
So what was Groany talking about, then: emissions per capita or total national emissions. Because if the population has increased by 19.36% but 'total' emissions have actually decreased by "a tiny drop", then emissions per capita has decreased significantly. Ditto NZ.
So why can't Groany actually be clear on what she's saying ? Has she no educational standing at all ?
Apparently the Dog Botherer’s documentary on the ABC is now available. According to the SMH, it’s nothing more than repetition of the same old accusations and opinions. I doubt that’s a surprise to anyone.
ReplyDeleteThanks Anon, that set the pond in search of quotes:
Deletehttps://www.smh.com.au/culture/tv-and-radio/your-abc-exposed-doco-lands-some-punches-but-exposes-little-more-than-an-agenda-20220726-p5b4vb.html
...to illustrate how “out of touch” with mainstream Australia the ABC is Kenny claimed 40 per cent of its Sydney staff voted Green. Trouble is, that figure comes from a 2013 survey of journalists from multiple organisations. Only 59 of the 605 respondents worked for the ABC – which has more than 4000 staff in all – and only 14 of them said they would vote Green. Statistically, an uncontrolled sample of that size is utterly meaningless.
Kenny also took issue with the lack of conservative voices on shows such as Q+A, but he included a clip that showed him conceding on the show that other conservatives had been invited on but had declined to appear. This was a frequent pattern during the Coalition’s years in power, and a major contributor to the (contested) perception that the show was biased towards the left.
In classic doorstop style, Kenny buttonholed managing director David Anderson at an ABC function, claiming he had little alternative because no one from the national broadcaster would agree to be interviewed for his program. Anderson replied by saying he would happily appear on Kenny’s show if only he were invited.
Repeatedly the case was made that the broadcaster is hopelessly skewed towards the worldview of its citybound, and especially Sydney-based, staff. There’s some truth to that. But nowhere was it mentioned that Sky’s programs are predominantly made and broadcast from within its headquarters just 14 minutes away from the ABC’s Ultimo HQ, or that, unlike the ABC, Sky doesn’t have much of a regional newsgathering capacity or commitment at all.
And so on and on ...as you'd expect of a gormless twit within sipping distance of the greatest baristas in the world, Surry Hills being much more 'leet than Ultimo... what a klutz, what a prize doofus he is, and yet so tone deaf he can't hear the tired old notes he keeps playing out of tune ...
"This [heavily stacked with conservative talking heads] was all sandwiched between two slices of sentiment designed to appeal to Sky viewers who may still harbour some lingering emotional attachment to the ABC..." So I guess the question is: how many "Sky viewers" are there altogether, and how few of them would still have some "emotional attachment" to the ABC ?
DeleteOh, and will Sky/Kenny turn this into an annual event ?
Sheesh, GB it's a daily event, this was just the special state of origin issue to refine the daily bump and grind into an event, but when the pond looked at the ratings for Foxtel for Tuesday, 26th July 2022...
Deletehttps://tvblackbox.com.au/page/2022/07/27/tuesday-ratings-hunted-australia-lifts-channel-10-again/
... it seems it had a grand total of 85,000 viewers, which up against the 25 million plus in the country is a staggering achievement ...
Still it beat the Bolter, who had 57,000, and petulant Peta only had 43,000, while it meant the dog botherer's usual daily assault only collared 32,000, which is triumphantly more than the 31,000 who wasted their lives with Piers Morgan.
And people actually pay money to the chairman for this stuff ...
Oh, meam defectum intelligere, DP; we AFL types don't think in terms of "state of origin". And gracias for the link, though I'm sad to see 'The Repair Shop UK' under the fox banner, I quite enjoyed that BBC show for a while.
DeleteAnd talking about 'state of origin' what is the origin, and termination, of homo sapiens sapiens:
ReplyDelete"The west risks the initiation of nuclear conflict with China or Russia because of a “breakdown of communication” with the two countries, the UK’s national security adviser has warned."
Poor communication ‘raises risk of nuclear war with China or Russia’
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/jul/27/breakdown-of-communication-higher-risk-of-nuclear-conflict-with-china-or-russia-adviser-warns
Oh wau, just because of a “breakdown of communication” we might just rain down nuclear destruction upon each other. Well if it is to be, maybe it should be soon and mainly for us, rather than later and taking a whole planet's worth of other species with us via climate change's 'global heating'.
Goodness gracious:
ReplyDelete"Dozens of former Democrats and Republicans to form new party in bid to appeal to voters unhappy with America’s two-party system".
Centrists to launch Forward, new third US political party
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/jul/27/forward-republicans-democrats-new-third-political-party
'Course we've already got our 3rd party: Greens and Teals and Pauline Hanson and Bob Katter.