Thursday, October 31, 2024

If it looks like ethnic cleansing ...

 

While avoiding the reptiles, the pond has been roaming wild and free, and this Haaretz editorial was simply too important to leave lurking behind a paywall. 

It was titled If It Looks Like Ethnic Cleansing, It Probably Is, came out a couple of days ago, and started off with a snap, labelled Palestinians carry their belongings as they flee areas of Gaza City in the northern Gaza Strip, earlier in October:




It has to be said that in terms of showing devastation, it didn't quite match up to the visual comparison featuring destruction in Lebanon, which accompanied a NY Times story:



Never mind, there's not much point in measuring, comparing and contrasting ethnic cleansing porn, there's too much of it about. 

Instead here's what Haaretz said:

For three and a half weeks, Israeli forces have been besieging the northern Gaza Strip. Israel has almost completely blocked the entry of humanitarian aid, thereby starving the hundreds of thousands of people who live there. Information emerging from the besieged area is only partial, because ever since the war began, Israel has barred journalists from entering Gaza.
But even based on the little that has been revealed to the public, two things can be said about the siege. First, the scale of the civilian casualties from the army's daily bombings of towns and refugee camps in northern Gaza – children, women, elderly people and men who are innocent of any crime – is enormous.
Moreover, medical and other aid facilities have largely collapsed, and other institutions are also collapsing. Consequently, hundreds of thousands of people are now at risk of starvation or are already suffering terrible hunger.
Israel says it told the residents that they needed to leave northern Gaza, and even now, they can still move southward on routes the army has designated for this purpose. Thus the residents, many of whom have already been uprooted two or three times or even more from the places to which they have fled the terrors of war, are now being asked to move again. Yet Israel has refrained from giving the displaced any guarantee that they will be able to return once the war ends.
Given this, it's no wonder that grave suspicions have arisen that Israel is effectively perpetrating ethnic cleansing in northern Gaza and that this operation is intended to permanently empty this area of Palestinians.
This suspicion fits with both the principles of the "generals' plan" being pushed by Maj. Gen. (res.) Giora Eiland – a plan Defense Minister Yoav Gallant has denied implementing – and the demands of the Jewish supremacist parties in the governing coalition that are openly pursuing a policy of mass expulsions and the renewal of Jewish settlement in northern Gaza.
Ethnic cleansing is both a moral crime and a legal one. Criminal law treats mass expulsions as both a war crime and a crime against humanity. Horrifyingly, some members of Benjamin Netanyahu's government want to commit these crimes.
As soon as the war began, they began calling for "erasing Gaza" and for perpetrating a "second Nakba." But many Israelis made light of such statements, and the law enforcement system, headed by Attorney General Gali Baharav-Miara, refrained from dealing with this incitement to commit crimes.
Now, we can see the results: Israel is sliding into ethnic cleansing; its soldiers are carrying out the criminal policies of the messianic, Kahanist right; and even the opposition on the center and center-left isn't making a peep. This consensus behind ethnic cleansing is shameful, and every public leader who doesn't demand an end to the de facto expulsion is supporting this crime and has become a party to it.
If this process doesn't stop immediately, hundreds of thousands of people will become refugees, entire communities will be destroyed and the moral and legal stain of this crime will cling to and pursue every Israel

It won't stop of course. Benji (the PM, not the canine movie star) is too intent on a wanton killing spree, and perhaps thinking of the real estate opportunities, with Mediterranean sea views.

For a repeat of what the editorial said and some relevant links, see Brett Wiklkins' piece 'If It Looks Like Ethnic Cleansing, It Probably Is,' Says Israeli Newspaper of North Gaza Siege, with these closing notes:

....Israel was founded in 1948, largely through the ethnic cleansing of more than 750,000 Arabs from Palestine during the Nakba, or "catastrophe." Zionist militias—the two most violent of which were led by future Israeli prime ministers—utilized terror tactics including massacres and a death march to force the Indigenous Arabs from their homeland.
Israeli ethnic cleansing continued over the following eight decades and, according to critics, currently involves home demolitions and expulsions in the illegally occupied West Bank and East Jerusalem, systematic land theft, and pogroms and other violent attacks by Jewish settler colonists backed—and sometimes joined—by Israel Defense Forces troops.
United Nations officials and international human rights groups said this week's Knesset vote to ban the life-saving U.N. Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA) will exacerbate Israeli crimes in Gaza, including ethnic cleansing.
"Efforts to eliminate UNRWA are illegal under international law and will only amplify the genocide and ethnic cleansing Israel is enacting in Gaza while also undermining long-term prospects for peace," the American Friends Service Committee, a Quaker group, said Tuesday. "The Israeli government is not only deliberately blocking humanitarian and medical aid to people who are starving and dying, it is undermining support for Palestine refugees and the international legal framework protecting their rights."
On Monday, Francesca Albanese, the U.N.'s special rapporteur on Palestine, published a report "contextualizing the situation within a decades long process of territorial expansion and ethnic cleansing aimed at liquidating the Palestinian presence in Palestine."
Albanese's report was released a day after Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich—who supports the "total annihilation" of Gaza and said that killing 2 million Palestinians would be "justified and moral"—reiterated his call for Israeli annexation of the entire West Bank and the expulsion of the occupied territory's Palestinians.
Israel's policies and practices in Gaza—where more than 150,000 Palestinians have been killed or wounded by Israeli forces since the Hamas-led attack on Israel on October 7, 2023—are the subject of an ongoing South Africa-led genocide case before the International Court of Justice in The Hague.

Some might quibble at some of the details in that piece, but it's impossible to quibble about the mass starvation, ethnic cleansing and humanitarian disaster currently unfolding in Gaza, the West Bank and Lebanon.

It doesn't seem appropriate to end with a few 'toons, but what the hell, toujours gai in the face of war crimes and genocide.










From Rowan Dean to the war on Christmas to the Ministry of Love to crowd size freak-out to genocide ...

 

The pond took its first look at the lizard Oz and was totally unnerved.

Petulant Peta, Jack the Insider and Killer Creighton reporting from the USA? It was more than the pond could take, the pond simply couldn't do it. 

Thursdays were always bleak, but this day seemed even bleaker, so the pond put the tepid pile of garbage to one side.

But what to do to keep the comments section open without changing the settings?

Luckily the pond was pleased, as proud as dinkum punch really, to see Sky News (Au, not the divested Pom mob) score an honourable mention in (the remarkably cheerful) Sam Stein's piece for The Bulwark, Breaking: Sources Say the Story You’re Reading Isn’t Real.

The pond's own acquaintance with Sky News (Au) is extremely limited. 

The pond doesn't mind garbage but paying for it is a bridge too far. After all, if you still have the likes of Rowan Dean on your books, then in the kingdom of the blind, the one-eyed climate science denialist moron is going to be the king.




Back to Stein and that dishonourable mention, infinitely pleasing, and a loon called Bad Hombre who specialises in false reporting, including a recent yarn about the Harris-Walz campaign paying for entertainers to turn up to her rallies.

...The post was fiction. The account that “broke” the story was “Bad Hombre,” one of the cycle’s more nefarious posters on X. With a following of 115,000, Bad Hombre has gained influence and visibility on the right for being a prolific source of tweets that use journalistic language and framing to create the impression of real reporting even though the posts amount to nothing more than MAGA fanfic. It’s literally fake news.
Much of Bad Hombre’s content is based on stories and bits of information from other publications. But occasionally, a post will give the impression that Bad Hombre has insider access to people in Harris’s close orbit (or in the Washington Post newsroom) and is just gleefully spilling the tea. 
Days before his Lizzo post, the account—the bio for which reads “Political commentary. Catholic. Populist.”—issued the following post: 
Major drama within the Kamala Harris campaign this morning. A source reveals that Harris screamed at and angrily berated her campaign manager Julie Chavez for over 30 minutes on the phone this morning. . . . Chavez was in tears during the phone call as Kamala shred her to pieces, called her an idiot, inept, horrible at your f-ing job, and told her that her stupid advice is going to be the reason she loses.
Actual Harris campaign sources, not surprisingly, were totally perplexed. 
It’s impossible to know the extent of Bad Hombre’s reach. But according to the barebones metrics X makes publicly visible on posts, the made-up Chavez story alone got seven million views. 
Occasionally, Bad Hombre will post a bit of “news” based on actual public information. But these morsels of reported fact are presented in a way that fundamentally distorts the story. On October 22, Gwen Walz canceled a reproductive rights talk in Maine without offering an explanation. Bad Hombre picked up on the news, posting that the vice presidential nominee’s wife had canceled the event “angrily” because “Kamala spoke to Tim Walz to tell him his wife’s overbearing attitude was hurting her with male voters.” That post got 1.8 million views. 
One of his more infamous posts—falsely accusing a Harris-supporting Republican couple in Pennsylvania of being paid actors and left-wing film producers—prompted Sky News Australia to do an entire segment on it as if it were true. (“This was great investigative journalism by the journalist that went and found that out,” one Sky News contributor says.) The couple said their life was turned into chaos, although they’ve since embraced their role as Harris surrogates.

Yeay, minor bush league Sky News finally made it to the Faux Noise big time.

At this point Stein posted a link to X featuring said Sky News (Au) distribution of lies, which should have come with an "unsafe, about to enter Uncle Leon cesspool" warning, but where you can still see the clip (unlike the screen cap below).




If you liked you could go straight to Dinesh recycling Sky News (Au) recycling garbage. This also contained the link, which is just as well because the pond understands that Sky News (Au) took the original down:




Ye ancient world of cat and dog eaters, preferably with ketchup and pepper, how lucky to live in a world where Dinesh D'Souza pays attention to your work and means something other than barking mad insanity howling at many moons.

Of course Sky News (AU) is just a wannabe aspirational drop kick bunch of losers who'd like to imagine themselves as Faux Noise down under, but credit where credit is due. 

Faux Noise has had decades at refining its knives, as noted by Gretchen Carlson in a tweet:




Ye ancient cats and dogs, served with mustard and mayonnaise, the pond can remember the days that Gretchen made a living on Faux Noise getting outraged about Festivus:




Oh they were the good days, when the war on Xmas was always worth a laugh.

In an interview last week on the American Family Radio program “AFA Today,” Fox News host Gretchen Carlson repeated her strong stance against Festivus, a fake holiday featured on “Seinfeld,” by arguing that the “sacrilegious” holiday “denigrates Christianity.”
Carlson told host Kevin McCullough that a Festivus pole display in the Washington state capitol next to a Christmas tree was “outrageous,” adding: “I don’t want to have to drive around, eventually, years gone by with my kids looking at all the Nativity scenes during Christmas time and say, ‘Oh look kids, there’s the baby Jesus, way behind the Festivus pole, you can barely see him.’”
Carlson previously explained that she does not want to see a Festivus pole because “I’m all for free speech and free rights, just not on December 25th.”That was it for the Stein/Sky News (Au) connection, but while at The Bulwark, the pond did enjoy an Orwellian reference by William Kristol (ye ancient cats and hounds, the pond can remember the days when Kristol presented as a fatuous fop).

Once the war on Xmas is recalled, Megyn Kelly immediately springs to mind, as stupid now as she was back in the day. 

There was Jon Stewart, still turning up on a Monday for The Daily Show, way back in 2015:




There must be more juice in the war on Xmas, and after tonight, it'll be less than two months to go. Time for the outrage machine to get cranking.

That was it for the Stein/Sky News (AU) connection, but while at The Bulwark, the pond did enjoy an Orwellian reference by William Kristol.

Ye ancient cats grilled medium rare and hounds served in their juices, the pond can remember the days when Kristol presented as a fatuous fop:




Cf. Why is Bill Kristol always wrong?

Say what you will but the mango Mussolini has managed to bring together a weird assortment of extremely strange bedfellows, including the pond, Bill Kristol and Arnold Schwarzenegger, immortalised by Clive James as a brown condom full of walnuts ...

But back to that Kristol quote:

...Yesterday morning, Donald Trump spoke at Mar-a-Lago. He had nothing much to say, but apparently wanted to get in the news cycle before Kamala Harris spoke at the Ellipse last night. In any case, Trump made no apologies for Sunday’s remarkable hatefest in Madison Square Garden.
Quite the contrary, he offered this about that occasion:
The love in that room, it was breathtaking. There’s never been an event that beautiful. It was a love fest. It was love for our country.
You might not have thought that what you saw Sunday at the Garden was beautiful. In fact it might have looked ugly. You might not have thought that what you saw was love. It might have looked more like hate.
But Trump says it was love. Who are we to argue? To do so might make us enemies from within. And Trump and his gang will wreak vengeance and exact retribution, if they win, on those who are enemies from within. But not to worry. They’ll wreak vengeance and exact retribution under the banner of love.
There’s a precedent for this. The interior ministry in George Orwell’s Oceania, the building with no windows but with its interior lights always on, the heart of state power and repression, the place where submission to Big Brother is ultimately enforced. That is the Ministry of Love.

The pond will have to remember that when dealing with the odes to hate that emanate from the lizard Oz. The reptiles are merely doing the work of the Ministry of Love. To quote a few lines:

The Ministry of Truth contained, it was said, three thousand rooms above ground level, and corresponding ramifications below. Scattered about London there were just three other buildings of similar appearance and size. So completely did they dwarf the surrounding architecture that from the roof of Victory Mansions you could see all four of them simultaneously. They were the homes of the four Ministries between which the entire apparatusof government was divided. The Ministry of Truth, which concerned itself with news, entertainment, education, and the fine arts. The Ministry of Peace, which concerned itself with war. The Ministry of Love, which maintained law and order. And the Ministry of Plenty, which was responsible for economic affairs. Their names, in Newspeak: Minitrue, Minipax, Miniluv, and Miniplenty.

...The Ministry of Love was the really frightening one. There were no windows in it at all. Winston had never been inside the Ministry of Love, nor within half a kilometre of it. It was a place impossible to enter except on official business, and then only by penetrating through a maze of barbed-wire entanglements, steel doors, and hidden machine-gun nests. Even the streets leading up to its outer barriers were roamed by gorilla-faced guards in black uniforms, armed with jointed truncheons.

...One did not know what happened inside the Ministry of Love, but it waspossible to guess: tortures, drugs, delicate instruments that registered your  nervous reactions, gradual wearing-down by sleeplessness and solitude  and persistent questioning. Facts, at any rate, could not be kept hidden. They could be tracked down by enquiry, they could be squeezed out of you by torture. But if the object was not to stay alive but to stay human, what difference did it ultimately make? They could not alter your feelings: for that matter you could not alter them yourself, even if you wanted to. They could lay bare in the utmost detail everything that you had done or said or thought; but the inner heart, whose workings were mysterious even to yourself, remained impregnable.

...He did not know where he was. Presumably he was in the Ministry of Love, but there was no way of making certain. He was in a high-ceilinged windowless cell with walls of glittering white porcelain. Concealed lamps flooded it with cold light, and there was a low, steady humming sound which he supposed had something to do with the air supply. A bench, or shelf, just wide enough to sit on ran round the wall, broken only by the door and, at the end opposite the door, a lavatory pan with no wooden seat. There were four telescreens, one in each wall.

Speaking of the MM and his ministering to Love, predictably he totally lost it over comparative crowd sizes

Who knows how he'd feel, what he'd XXXX, how he'd react, if someone asked him to compare his cock's size to that of Arnold Palmer's:



Lordy, lordy, if he does squeak a win, the USA can look forward to at least four years of psychosis on parade. Who knows what it will look like four years hence, if senility and dementia maintain their relentless march.

Finally, to strike a sombre note, the pond would like to put a face on the ethnic cleansing and genocide that's currently being perpetrated in Gaza.

Come on down Yulia Malinovsky, featured at CNN: Israeli MP behind bill to expel key UN agency accuses US of interfering with process.




She was one of many, but she was a barking mad fundamentalist leader of the pack.

Is there a meta-irony to be found? Well yes, because Malinovsky was born in Ukraine, where Vlad the Sociopath is busy waging his own form of ethnic cleansing and genocide.

So it goes ... and so the pond turns to the 'toons for a little relief and a celebration of a day that has spread through Newtown like cockroaches, rats, or a virus.






And here's one for Uncle Leon, bizarre billionaire, Elon Musk Wants Big Families. He Bought a Secret Compound for His. (sorry, NY Times paywall):





Tuesday, October 29, 2024

The hard truth: why you shouldn't trust billionaires of the Bezos kind ...

 

Do the maths. It isn't hard, it isn't complicated, it's more 2 + 2 = no endorsement.

In the Bezos world, WaPo is just a trinket, an indulgence, a chance to sound righteous and be on the side of the angels.

Just as notably, in the Bezos world, what matters is what might happen if Trump scores a win. Huge government contracts suddenly made tricky. And who knows what else a vindictive, thoroughly nasty Mango Mussolini (hereinafter MM) might do. 

The Post v. a hostile MM? An easy peasy choice. Put aside garbage island and watermelon jokes. Put aside News of 200,000 or so subscribers cancelling because of the recent kerfuffle. 

They're just water off a billionaire ducky's back. 

If Harris squeaks a win, they're not supposed to play that way, and anyway, likely all will be eventually forgiven and forgotten, and never mind, the rag's never going to be a profit centre. 

But if the MM gets back in, think of the damage, shed a tear in sympathy, think of the moola that might go missing from the Bezos hip pocket.

Don't take the pond's word for it. Read  Jeff Stein, Jacqueline Alemany and Josh Dawsey in WaPo scribbling this story (sorry the pond doesn't link to a wretched rag deep in despondency):

Some billionaires, CEOs hedge bets as Trump vows retribution
With the race tight, some business elites are toning down past criticism of the former president.

Updated October 28, 2024 at 9:23 p.m. EDT|Published October 28, 2024 at 6:00 a.m. EDT

At a five-star resort in California last week, Wall Street executives, fast-food CEOs, a few dozen other industry titans and two former presidents gathered for off-the-record conversations. One subject that inevitably came up, according to two people familiar with the matter: the possibility that former president Donald Trump could return to the White House.

The gathering of the Business Council — an invitation-only association of chief executives — at the Waldorf Astoria Monarch Beach in Dana Point was not supposed to be about the election, but some attendees wound up discussing how to protect themselves and their companies if Trump wins the presidency next week and tries to use the power of the Oval Office against his perceived enemies, said the people, speaking on the condition of anonymity to describe private conversations...

And so on and a little further down:

...Two Trump campaign advisers, who also spoke on the condition of anonymity to reflect private conversations, said numerous executives have been trying to reach out to the former president’s team late in the race.

“I’ve told CEOs to engage as fast as possible because the clock is ticking. … If you’re somebody who has endorsed Harris, and we’ve never heard from you at any point until after the election, you’ve got an uphill battle,” the Trump adviser said. “People are back-channeling, looking at their networks — they’re talking to lobbyists to see what they can do to connect with the president and his team.”

Trump allies hailed what they say are signs of neutrality from other billionaires. Amazon founder Jeff Bezos, who owns The Washington Post, decided that The Post would no longer endorse presidential candidates, a change announced last week. The Post had an endorsement of Harris in the works. That came just days after Patrick Soon-Shiong, who owns the Los Angeles Times, blocked that paper’s endorsement of Harris.

Both moves sparked an uproar, with critics saying they reflected concerns about the owners’ financial interests — Amazon has billions of dollars in cloud computing contracts with the federal government, and Blue Origin, Bezos’s rocket company, has contracts with the Space Force and NASA. Soon-Shiong, a biotech investor, could have future business before federal regulators.

The Post has said the discussion to cease endorsing in presidential elections was made internally and was a return to a prior policy. Soon-Shiong told the Los Angeles Times that he thought picking one candidate over another would be divisive.

In an op-ed for The Post published Monday night, Bezos said he regretted the timing of the announcement about not endorsing anymore, but that his decision had nothing to do with any of his business interests.

Trump allies have cheered these developments as evidence that these elites agree with them that the former president will soon be returning to the White House.

“The elites and the money — they sense Trump is going to win. You don’t think Jeff Bezos looks at Polymarket?” said Bill White, a Trump fundraiser, referring to the political gambling site that tracks the odds of the race and has seen more betting on Trump to win lately. (Experts have questioned whether Trump’s rise in the betting markets has been manipulated by a few large accounts.) “Bezos not endorsing Kamala Harris — I think that’s a $50 million endorsement for Trump. Not picking a horse is picking a horse.”

Trump campaign spokesman Brian Hughes said in a statement that industry support for the former president reflects the strength of Trump’s economic agenda.

At the Al Smith dinner in New York earlier this month, a number of top business officials had a special VIP reception for Trump so they could talk to him before he took the stage, according to people who attended.

And so to the hard truth. Jeff Bezos is just another dissembling American billionaire, full of bullshit. 

Here's his pathetic, self-pitying rambling self-justification in full, published by the hapless WaPo while subscribers cancel and staff impotently rage at being done over (sorry the pond doesn't link to a rag that's been sent to the deeply sorry corner):

The hard truth: Americans don’t trust the news media
A note from our owner.
October 28, 2024 at 7:26 p.m. EDT
Jeff Bezos is the owner of The Washington Post.
By Jeff Bezos

In the annual public surveys about trust and reputation, journalists and the media have regularly fallen near the very bottom, often just above Congress. But in this year’s Gallup poll, we have managed to fall below Congress. Our profession is now the least trusted of all. Something we are doing is clearly not working.

Let me give an analogy. Voting machines must meet two requirements. They must count the vote accurately, and people must believe they count the vote accurately. The second requirement is distinct from and just as important as the first.

Likewise with newspapers. We must be accurate, and we must be believed to be accurate. It’s a bitter pill to swallow, but we are failing on the second requirement. Most people believe the media is biased. Anyone who doesn’t see this is paying scant attention to reality, and those who fight reality lose. Reality is an undefeated champion. It would be easy to blame others for our long and continuing fall in credibility (and, therefore, decline in impact), but a victim mentality will not help. Complaining is not a strategy. We must work harder to control what we can control to increase our credibility.

Update: he shoots, he scores:




Stay out of Baltimore, but carry on regardless:

Presidential endorsements do nothing to tip the scales of an election. No undecided voters in Pennsylvania are going to say, “I’m going with Newspaper A’s endorsement.” None. What presidential endorsements actually do is create a perception of bias. A perception of non-independence. Ending them is a principled decision, and it’s the right one. Eugene Meyer, publisher of The Washington Post from 1933 to 1946, thought the same, and he was right. By itself, declining to endorse presidential candidates is not enough to move us very far up the trust scale, but it’s a meaningful step in the right direction. I wish we had made the change earlier than we did, in a moment further from the election and the emotions around it. That was inadequate planning, and not some intentional strategy.

I would also like to be clear that no quid pro quo of any kind is at work here. Neither campaign nor candidate was consulted or informed at any level or in any way about this decision. It was made entirely internally. Dave Limp, the chief executive of one of my companies, Blue Origin, met with former president Donald Trump on the day of our announcement. I sighed when I found out, because I knew it would provide ammunition to those who would like to frame this as anything other than a principled decision. But the fact is, I didn’t know about the meeting beforehand. Even Limp didn’t know about it in advance; the meeting was scheduled quickly that morning. There is no connection between it and our decision on presidential endorsements, and any suggestion otherwise is false.

When it comes to the appearance of conflict, I am not an ideal owner of The Post. Every day, somewhere, some Amazon executive or Blue Origin executive or someone from the other philanthropies and companies I own or invest in is meeting with government officials. I once wrote that The Post is a “complexifier” for me. It is, but it turns out I’m also a complexifier for The Post.

You can see my wealth and business interests as a bulwark against intimidation, or you can see them as a web of conflicting interests. Only my own principles can tip the balance from one to the other. I assure you that my views here are, in fact, principled, and I believe my track record as owner of The Post since 2013 backs this up. You are of course free to make your own determination, but I challenge you to find one instance in those 11 years where I have prevailed upon anyone at The Post in favor of my own interests. It hasn’t happened.

Lack of credibility isn’t unique to The Post. Our brethren newspapers have the same issue. And it’s a problem not only for media, but also for the nation. Many people are turning to off-the-cuff podcasts, inaccurate social media posts and other unverified news sources, which can quickly spread misinformation and deepen divisions. The Washington Post and the New York Times win prizes, but increasingly we talk only to a certain elite. More and more, we talk to ourselves. (It wasn’t always this way — in the 1990s we achieved 80 percent household penetration in the D.C. metro area.)

While I do not and will not push my personal interest, I will also not allow this paper to stay on autopilot and fade into irrelevance — overtaken by unresearched podcasts and social media barbs — not without a fight. It’s too important. The stakes are too high. Now more than ever the world needs a credible, trusted, independent voice, and where better for that voice to originate than the capital city of the most important country in the world? To win this fight, we will have to exercise new muscles. Some changes will be a return to the past, and some will be new inventions. Criticism will be part and parcel of anything new, of course. This is the way of the world. None of this will be easy, but it will be worth it. I am so grateful to be part of this endeavor. Many of the finest journalists you’ll find anywhere work at The Washington Post, and they work painstakingly every day to get to the truth. They deserve to be believed.

"The lady doth protest too much, methinks."

Maybe those wayward 200,000 or so subscribers hit the old hip pocket nerve, at least to the point of paying some hack to hack out some dissembling crap. 

What if Bezos managed to do an X, Uncle Leon style? Why that might affect other profit centres, and it's to the pond's regret that it never uses Amazon or Prime, so it can't make an ineffectual gesture.

“He who protests the loudest, it has been said, is often the guiltiest.”

Update with an update: He shoots, he scores with his valiant defence:




And so to another regret. 

The pond hasn't missed reptile wrangling in the slightest, but it has missed US cartoons, including Mike Luckovich, and this one struck a chord on the matter of migrants poisoning the United States:




Here's a couple of others, still relevant:






A splendid suggestion ...


The pond still isn't up to reptile wrangling - such activities require super human strength and fitness - but there are compensations.

Just this morning the pond was lying in bed idly browsing and came across a splendid piece by Simon Jenkins full of wise insights. The pond always turns to the Graudian first thing, and is always rewarded, and not just by a cracking Crace.

Perhaps the pond had on the wrong reading glasses, but Jenkins' piece seemed to be entitled It’s easy for the British to insult Herr Hitler – but here’s why it’s a very bad idea.

The pitch was just as intriguing: A majority of Britons may want Ernst Thälmann to win the German election, but antagonising a powerful potential ally is unwise.

What a pitch, and naturally the pond was curious and plunged in:

Is it wise for Britons to heap abuse on Herr Hitler? At present he is the marginal favourite to win next week’s German election – with some Britons strongly behind his opponent Ernst Thälmann. But is overt hostility sensible?

What a great opening. The pond has long been a supporter of the much maligned Neville Chamberlain, who showed the right way to approach politics. Some thought him a craven, supine, delusional chap, but how wrong they were...



Most recent polls show two out of three Britons want Thälmann to win, including a majority even of Conservatives. 

The pond isn't sure about this, what with many thinking that Thälmann was a Commie rat fink who should be locked up or deported to Rwanda, but still, the premise kept the pond hooked.

The Labour party sent about 100 activists to aid Thälmann in some swing provinces. The UK media is almost universally hostile, calling Herr Hitler crass, illiterate, vulgar, coarse and fascist. He is identified with the Munich Beer Hall putsch, but should he be punished for a little indiscretion and jail time? Only Reform UK is for Herr Hitler Surely dignity would counsel respect for an ally’s internal democracy, and caution in alienating the leader of of a country who in these troubled times could become Britain’s most powerful ally. There's nothing like a little ballot box corruption to breed respect for another country's immune king.

First, what’s new? Britain’s Labour and German social democrats have bonded for decades, including canvassing and attending each other’s conferences. As a student I once campaigned for Friedrich Ebert in Munich, and I have a free tie to prove it. Britain has itself interfered in elections around the world since time began. Austria interfered on Herr Hitlers’s behalf in the 1930s, though Herr Hitler denied it. Britain blatantly interfered in US elections in 1940.

A different question is whether it is wise. Americans can refer to Herr Hitler as a fascist, but such facile parallels do little beyond enraging their subjects. More to the point, British opinions on the matter are more likely to evoke the reaction of “mind your own business”. Herr Hitler might have had his alarming moments, but the German constitution saw him off in 1933 – just – and may yet do so again. German industrialists and media owners are united in this thinking.

In 1938, Herr Hitler welcomed the British prime minister, Neville Chamberlain, to the Führerbau, and rather endearingly gave him a scrap of paper. The British press sniggered. When the BBC asked him a viciously biased question, claiming to represent “our viewers”, he was able to laugh it off. In the same outgoing spirit, he invited Neville to dine with him for two hours last month and congratulated him on his election success. These may be merely the courtesies expected of public figures, but Herr Hitler adhered to them.

American presidents are complicated. They are political leaders, but they are also heads of state. Diplomatic custom accords them a certain dignity. In Herr Hitler’s case, diplomacy must tilt in the same direction. Britons were annoyed when Friedrich Ebert expressed a strong opinion on the matter of the Treaty of Versailles. But when Ebert sought help from Britain to compensate for the punitive impact oft the treaty in the 1920s, he got short shrift. Herr Hitler then threatened to go a step further and impose a punishing 10% tariff on all British exports to Germany.

This was something Neville could well do without. He is now proposing to penalise American non-doms in Britain in the budget. He may also need to react to a Herr Hitler invasion of Poland, and the resulting demand for a step-change in British defence spending. Other things being equal, personally insulting Herr Hitler in such circumstances seems plain stupid.

Herr Hitler represents a periodic surge in German rightwing populism. It is a turning against the supposedly liberal east- and west-coast governing elites. Its politics is proletarian, xenophobic, protectionist and conservative. This may not be to every Briton’s taste, though Britain saw a similar surge in Reform UK’s vote at this year’s election, disguised by it splitting a Conservative majority vote.

Such results are the privilege of the franchise. Liberal democrats can bewail them, but they must respect the winners – even if the losers sometimes do not. They must also treat with the winners in the rough and tumble of international politics. Ostracism is never the answer. Disrespecting the outcome of democracy is the shortcut to disaster.

The pond might have mangled the original a little, but what a splendid prescription for peace in our time. 

The pond understands that Herr Hitler's personal secretary has already responded to Jenkins by promising there will be no more territorial demands or tariffs or coups in the next month, which is tremendously reassuring. Sure Ukraine might go down, but who cares about Ukraine? Isn't it way past time for a better relationship with Vlad Putin? Sure Palestinian dreams might be extinguished, but they've always been a flea on the rump of a tremendous theocracy.

As to such trifling matters as vaccines and climate science, no matter, just have another serve of French lies. Remember, fucking the planet is just part of the rough and tumble of international politics. Ostracism is never the answer. Disrespecting the outcome of democracy is the shortcut to disaster.

Sometimes the pond wonders why it bothers with reptile wrangling, when the spirit of the lizard Oz is abroad in so many ways.

In that spirit, the pond must end by mourning all the immortal Rowes it has missed in recent weeks, including this one ...





It turns out that Gillray did have a thing for food, as these show ...






Sunday, October 27, 2024

An interim note ...

Well, that was a long silence, and it's going to continue for a little longer, at least until the US elections are sorted, done and well dusted.

A near-death experience is always clarifying. The first one the pond had was at the age of eleven, helped along by incompetent doctors and a rustic hospital. The pond was pronounced as dying in the operating theatre, sending the pond's mother into a frenzied fit of praying. 

When the pond revived against the odds, she attributed it all to the long absent lord. Even at that tender age, the pond realised the logic was a bit suss. So She, in her ethereal malignity, should strike the pond down with peritonitis and all the rest, and offer six months in and out of intensive care, so She could impress the pond's mother with Her remarkable ability to stick Her nose into every bit of business going down in the universe? It was probably at that point that the pond began a slow, genteel slide into amiable atheism (you stick to your delusions and the pond will stick to its).

This time the pond had the good fortune to live right next to the RPA, a remarkable institution dressed out in Victorian architecture garb, which kindly arranged a set of top gun surgeons at a moment's notice on a Sunday. Five hours under, five keyholes, five days in hospital, and then a slow recovery, with the pond seriously enfeebled and memory completely shot. (The pond isn't sure of the mystical element in the number five). The pond won't hear a word said against the RPA, blessed with the power of the gods to restore life.

One side note. The pond's first brush with morphine came at stricken 11, with the ceiling opening up to reveal the animated abstract patterns and gigantic apocalyptic clouds swirling above. 

This time it took a couple of hits to quell the pain, so the pond was well out of it when it saw all of the illustrations ever used in this blog neatly arranged as tiles covering the ED's floor (though on reflection these reflexive images were too Simpsons laden, without the banality of chunks of reptile gobbets). Perhaps it would have been better to be a Bill Burroughs junkie.

While the pond slowly recovered, the world carried on its own path to hell. In the middle east, a rogue fundamentalist theocracy carried on its program of mass starvation, destruction, mass displacement, ethnic cleansing and genocide (but what a real estate opportunity, just like the West Bank, for the Chosen People and the Mango Mussolini, with bonus sea views).

The pond thought one set of figures said it all. Casualties from Iran's first missile attack ... one Palestinian. Israel's attack on Lebanon ... thousands dead, wounded and maimed. 

Israelis displaced from northern Israel ... c. 60-70k. Lebanese displaced in Lebanon ... 1.2 million or thereabouts. 

This conformed to the pond's understanding of the required ratio ... one Israeli life equal to maybe a thousand or perhaps ten thousand or so Palestinians or Lebanese people. 

It was a cunning ploy ... with assorted attacks on all and sundry, the cleansing of Gaza could proceed while the world was distracted by new war mongering without hint of let or ceasefire or the slightest interest in doing a deal for the remaining hostages. 

That a nation born of a Holocaust should emulate it with an attempt at a cleansing genocide is one of the crueller of recent ironies, while the wretched Biden administration stood by, impotent, hand wringing to no effect, Blinken always blinking while Benji (the PM, not the movie star) carried on regardless, a sure fire way to stay out of the clink. 

Perhaps a cease fire? How about another 2,000 lb. bomb, troops and missiles to help bring it about? That's led some in the US to back the mango Mussolini over Harris, apparently forgetting his attempts to ban Muslims and his support of Israel. If Harris loses, here's hoping they'll hold the MM's diet coke while Benji carries on with the MM's backing...

That's up there with Jill Stein, allegedly a greenie, doing her bit to give the MM an election break, thereby ensuring that 'drill baby, drill' mantra would return to favour ... if that's being a greenie, the long absent lord help the planet, because greenies won't be doing it.

Over in Ukraine, things aren't going well, with the sociopathic Vlad the impaler now turning to North Korean troops, while a few European leaders tut-tut, mutter and do sweet bugger all, as does the Biden administration, offering just enough by way of life support, but little by way of a path to a positive result.

During convalescence, the pond has shamefully neglected its herpetology studies, and hasn't once opened a single page or opinion piece at the lizard Oz. 

Such activities require a strength the pond has yet to recover, but all the same, the pond has spent an unseemly amount of time observing the madness that is the current USA.

It's an overflowing garbage can of suckers and losers, with half the country deep in the grip of a personality cult led by an inveterate liar, a charlatan, a huckster, a con artist and a snake oil salesman (so many trinkets to buy this election, not least a sixty buck bible printed in China and worth three bucks wholesale, not to mention free on the full to overflowing intertubes. Is there a Ryan Walters in the house to order up a fraudulent batch for Oklahoma?). 

The penchant for authoritarianism, dictatorship and Adolf isn't a bug, it's a feature, and it's nothing new - long ago star aviator Lindbergh was at the forefront. 

They were into it in a big way, and soon enough there'll be a Madison Garden repeat for the obsessed MM.




The US has always had a thing for monarchs, and having kicked out their original tribe (so that King Chuck must visit other colonies), they set about making the Presidency their own version. 

There have been good kings (FDR), bad kings (too many to mention) and middling kings, and there has been a relentless focus on the extended families of the kings that put the house of Windsor to shame. This elevation to kingly status has been blessed by the Supreme Court with the invented concept of presidential immunity, up there with the divine right of kings.

In recent times, the country has lost its way, mired in misinformation, disinformation and conspiracy theories, exemplified by that UFC commentator, thug lover and professional anti-vax moron Joe Rogan discussing UFOs and aliens with the MM.

The empire is in decline and decay and the temptation is to turn to historical references, like the Roman empire, as John Naughton did on the matter of the Zuck ...

Consider Mark Zuckerberg, supreme leader of Meta (née Facebook), who looks like an aggressive megalomaniac from central casting. Even the Economist, that bastion of neoliberal baloney, saw through him early, with a famous cover in April 2016 portraying Zuck as the Emperor Augustus on a weathered throne. But the guy’s Augustan complex goes back further than the Economist realised. On his honeymoon in Rome in 2012, for example, he took so many photographs of Augustus that his wife joked it was as if there were three people on the trip.




Indeed.

Then there's the obvious one of Adolf and 1933 with industrialists crowding around and thinking he'd be easily managed and they could improve their obscene wealth by making it positively pornographic... with the MM himself leading the way and making the comparison almost too obvious.

It's now beyond a platitude to that the MM loves dictators and would like to be one, and loves to have a chat with the likes of Vlad the sociopathic impaler fawning over him and playing on his vanity. 

The MM has never disguised his authoritarian impulses and a 2.0 version would see him unrestrained and unfettered. Likely he'd act in Roman emperor mode, feasting on junk food and diet coke while watching the telly, and only drifting down after eleven to see what his minions had done. 

If it stopped at that, it possibly wouldn't be much of a problem and his reign might pass like the first one, with only a pandemic and assorted policy follies to write home about (did Mexico ever pay for the wall that was never built?)

But there's a fly in the new MM ointment, and that's his minions and their mad schemes, not least the delusion that tariffs aren't a tax on domestic consumers. And with a climate science denialist in charge, the MM and his minions will drag the whole planet closer to catastrophe. (And what is it with the obsession with migrants, given that Uncle Leon was apparently an illegal alien when bringing his special brand of South African bred white nationalism to American shores, while both the MM and JD Vance married migrants, perhaps because no native would touch them with a barge pole).

There's a book to be written about Uncle Leon and his role as the newest oligarch, but the pond is too nauseated by thinking of the way his jumping exposed his tummy and his navel to the air.

It doesn't even matter whether Harris or the MM wins. If Harris manages to squeak out a win, she'll spend years combatting the legal warfare, the undermining, the endless conspiracy theories, the madness of a country that has lost its moorings ... where deplorables and the ignorati now make up half the country, while if the MM wins, hang on to your hat.

America has once again returned to being the land of the oligarchs. Again there are precedents - the 1890s, a period the MM loves, saw the rise of the robber barons.




Watch obsessive Jonathan V. Last, who wrote a funny piece about the MM's 100k watches (being hawked in a land whining about poverty), said as much about the role of oligarchs (and German industrialists in the 1930s) as needs to be said ... following on from the recent examples of US oligarchs bending the knee and preemptively kissing the MM's arse in WaPo and the LA Times ...

...that’s what this story is about: It’s about the most consequential American entrepreneur of his generation signaling his submission to Trump—and the message that sends to every other corporation and business leader in the country. In the world.
Killing this editorial says, If Jeff Bezos has to be nice to Trump, then so do you. Keep your nose clean, bub.
We have seen this movie before.
The year was 2003, and the scene was Russia, where Vladimir Putin, still in his first term as president, had not yet let the mask slip.
Putin was carefully consolidating power and he realized that the same oligarchs who had supported him initially were also a source of danger. Their money and control of important industries—especially the media—gave them independent bases of power. And every autocrat knows that dictatorship only works when his subjects understand that the only power they may have is the power he grants them.
At the time, Mikhail Khodorkovsky was the wealthiest man in Russia. He controlled Yukos, a massive oil company he cobbled together from formerly state-owned assets. He had the kind of wealth and power that made him untouchable, and he started making noises about getting more involved in politics—maybe even running for office.
So Putin had him arrested.
You may not remember this, but the Khodorkovsky case was a major piece of international news at the time. In the West, people weren’t quite sure what to make of it. Khodorkovsky’s people waged an aggressive PR campaign on his behalf claiming that his arrest was politically motivated and that Putin was becoming a thug.
Putin’s side portrayed it as an anti-corruption move, since Khodorkovsky was no angel.
Here in the West, we were all still giddy over glasnost and the end of the Cold War. We didn’t want to believe that Russia might be plunging back into authoritarianism. So people mostly took a wait-and-see approach.
But the Russians understood.
Khodorkovsky was convicted and sent to a labor camp in the Russian Far East while the government confiscated Yukos and redistributed it to Putin’s cronies. Khodorkovsky’s money, his power, his connections—none of it could protect him from Vladimir Putin.
The rest of the oligarchs got the message. If Putin could get to Khodorkovsky, he could get to anybody.
And so the oligarchs fell in line and ceased to be a source of concern to Putin. Instead of alternative power centers, they became vassals.
Which is exactly what Jeff Bezos has just taught Jamie Dimon and every other important American businessman.
These guys can hear the music. They’ve seen the sides being chosen: Elon Musk and Peter Theil assembling with Trump’s gangster government in waiting. They see Mark Zuckerberg praising Trump as a “badass.” And now they see Bezos getting in line, too.
What’s remarkable is that Trump didn’t have to arrest Bezos to secure his compliance. Trump didn’t even have to win the election. Just the fact that he has an even-money chance to become president was threat enough...

Germany in the 1930s ... Vlad's Russia ... the US in the 1890s ... the Roman empire in decay and decline. Take your pick. Whatever, it's going to be a bumpy ride these next few years... and not just for the US, but for the planet.

Even if the MM gets taken out by burgers (huzzah), he'll be replaced by a barking mad fundamentalist Catholic of the Opus Dei kind, deeply broken by his upbringing and with a weird Project 2025 gleam in his eye when he thinks about childless cat ladies (not the nuns, spare the nuns).

On the domestic front, the pond was pleased to note that Albo has solved the housing crisis, and that there will be no more Grundling (or is that verbal groping of the Bob Ellis kind?) in Crikey.

Compared to the US, it feels relatively normal.

After all, the lizard Oz's emeritus chairman is an oligarch who didn't need any Vlad the impaler style threats to help give the MM a stay out of jail card. 

He's the canker at the core, a migrant poisoning the blood of the country, a profound nihilistic cynic who'd sell his original citizenship for the chance to make a buck.

It's his business model, fear and disinformation producing a cornucopia of wealth and power. Faux Noise still leads the way, the New York Post forgets what it said after the coup, and turns back to the MM, and there are a host of imitators yearning to ride on the coat tails of the emeritus chairman's business model. 

The 1930s and the yellow press never really went away ... and so for the moment, the pond hopes to build up the strength needed for reptile wrangling and a return to inspecting the down under belly of this truly frightening beast. One that the emeritus chairman hopes to continue by court case and a reaching out from the grave.

The pond will do its best to return when what's left of the US, the full scale of the hurricane of election wreckage, can be studied, without another bloody useless poll as a completely irrelevant guide ... 

Posts might arrive a little later in the day, or be otherwise dilatory, but hopefully a little of the pond's memory bank will be restored from the back-up.

Finally, as Dean Martin used to say, a big thank you to all those who sent postcards, notes, and comments the pond's way ...

The pond appreciated them all, and missed the daily correspondence. 

Lurking in the pond's mind all the time were other tragedies. A month without 'toons? Intolerable, and so in closing some of the infallible Pope's offerings, some ancient, but still timely ...